Preventive maintenance plan in Excel: Why spreadsheets fail and when SMEs should switch to maintenance software

Picture of <div class="post-authorline">   <span class="author-name">Daniel Mirbach</span>,   <span class="author-role">Head of Marketing</span><br>   <time class="post-date" datetime="2025-10-15">Aachen, April 24, 2026</time>   <span class="sep"> | </span>   <span class="reading-time">17 Min. read </span> </div>

An employee organizes maintenance tasks in an industrial environment using a tablet; maintenance planning and documentation are the focus.
Maintenance in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is often the result of historical growth – pragmatic, functional, and built around existing tools. However, as companies scale or expectations around processes, transparency, and reliability change, many maintenance managers and planners begin to question whether their maintenance setup is still future-ready.
This article is aimed at SMEs with a manageable maintenance organization, multiple machines or assets, and possibly additional production sites that already use Excel for preventive maintenance planning or are currently evaluating whether spreadsheets are suitable for this purpose. The article provides context by:

What is the difference between preventive maintenance and a maintenance plan?

Preventive maintenance (PM) refers to all activities aimed at maintaining the intended condition of machines, equipment, and other technical assets. While preventive maintenance addresses the question of what needs to be done, a maintenance plan provides the structure and accountability for execution by defining when, how, and by whom maintenance activities are carried out. A maintenance plan consolidates all relevant information required for systematic implementation. Its level of detail may vary depending on the organization, but typical elements include:
Beyond organizational aspects, maintenance planning plays a critical role in operational safety, reliability, and regulatory compliance. Regularly and consistently executed maintenance activities help ensure the long-term safe operation of machines and equipment while reducing risks to employees, products, and ongoing operations. In regulated industries such as food and beverage production, structured maintenance and hygiene documentation is also a key component of HACCP-based safety concepts and a prerequisite for meeting quality and safety standards.

Why Excel is widely used for maintenance planning in SMEs

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) form the backbone of many economies, particularly in the European Union. They account for the majority of businesses, employ a significant share of the workforce, secure jobs, and contribute substantially to industrial value creation.1
However, the operating conditions of SMEs differ markedly from those of large enterprises, particularly when it comes to digital connectivity and system landscapes. While large organizations widely rely on enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, SMEs are far less digitally integrated.2 A similar pattern can be observed in the implementation of digital initiatives overall, with only a minority of companies having achieved a high level of digital maturity.
Differences also emerge in innovation activities. As company size increases, so do available resources and the ability to invest in structured innovation efforts. Smaller organizations tend to focus more strongly on product innovation, while process innovation often plays a secondary role.
These structural differences have a direct impact on internal processes. When digital integration and process innovation are less prevalent, SMEs adopt a highly pragmatic approach to using available resources. Excel is used in controlling for reporting, in procurement for demand overviews, and in production for order planning. Rather than introducing specialized software for every organizational task, existing tools are adapted and extended to additional departments and use cases, including maintenance planning.

Benefits of using Excel to create a preventive maintenance plan

For many SMEs, using Excel for maintenance planning initially offers clear advantages. In small teams and with manageable asset structures, Excel enables a quick and straightforward entry into structured maintenance planning. The key benefits of using Excel to create a preventive maintenance plan include:
As a result, Excel and spreadsheets represent a sensible first step toward making maintenance activities in small and medium sized enterprises more structured, traceable, and manageable.

When Excel and spreadsheets stop working for maintenance planning

Using Excel to set up a preventive maintenance plan and support maintenance planning activities can work well for many SMEs for a certain period of time. However, the situation changes as scope, complexity, and organizational requirements increase. In practice, this shift rarely happens overnight but rather becomes noticeable gradually in day-to-day work.

A growing number of machines

As the number of machines and equipment increases or as maintenance activities are spread across multiple production areas, halls, or sites, the effort required to maintain Excel-based maintenance plans rises significantly. Maintenance plans become larger, less transparent, and more prone to errors.

Multiple people involved

As soon as multiple employees, like planners and technicians, work with the same maintenance plan, or external service providers are involved, the coordination effort increases. Version conflicts, duplicate entries, and missing feedback become common issues.

Manual maintenance and lack of automation

Reminders, overdue tasks, or escalations must be monitored manually in Excel. As a result, the effectiveness of the maintenance plan depends heavily on the consistency and attention of individual users, increasing the risk of missed or delayed actions.

Limited traceability

Histories of completed maintenance activities, recurring failures, or spare parts used can be recorded in Excel, but the data is often stored in an unstructured way. Analyzing this information requires additional manual workload, and maintaining a consistent, end-to-end maintenance history becomes increasingly difficult.

Documentation and compliance requirements

Rising requirements for documentation – such as for audits, inspections, or internal reporting – call for complete, consistent, and traceable records. In Excel, information is typically spread across multiple files or worksheets. Changes are not always clearly traceable, which limits revision safety and makes reliable documentation harder to ensure.

Lack of integration with other processes

An Excel-based maintenance plan is typically not integrated with other operational processes. As a result, information on spare parts, work orders, or maintenance feedback exists in isolation, leading to manual handoffs and fragmented workflows.

Checklist for SMEs

The following checklist helps assess whether Excel is still sufficient in your organization for creating and managing preventive maintenance plans, or whether the organizational effort required for effective maintenance planning has already increased noticeably.
Organization & collaboration
Planning & reliability
Data maintenance & error risk
Transparency & traceability
Mobility & practical usability
Documentation & requirements
Key takeaway

The more of these statements apply to your situation, the clearer it becomes that Excel is reaching its organizational limits as a maintenance planner – and that moving to maintenance software is a sensible next step.

Moving from Excel and spreadsheets to maintenance software

For SMEs, moving from preventive maintenance plans based on Excel and spreadsheets to maintenance software represents an important step in the further development of their maintenance practices. The focus is not on digitalization for its own sake, but on accurately mapping existing processes with the goal of maximizing equipment availability, preventing functional failures, and ensuring the planned service life of assets.
For maintenance managers and planners in small and medium-sized enterprises, it is crucial that maintenance software does not have to be approached as a complex IT project. A transition is particularly advisable when the solution:
Highly complex systems whose functional scope is primarily designed for large enterprises are often perceived as an additional burden in this context. As a result, they tend to face lower user acceptance and frequently fail during the implementation of maintenance software in SMEs.

The Maintastic CMMS for SMEs

Maintastic is an example of a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) that takes into account the requirements of small and medium-sized enterprises. The software helps SMEs organize their maintenance activities digitally and efficiently. Instead of relying on Excel, paper-based processes, or overly complex systems, Maintastic offers an intuitive, mobile-first solution that is cloud-based and ready to use in a very short time.
Technical staff uses a mobile CMMS app to digitally complete weekly maintenance tasks and activities such as “Inspect and clean filling valves” on a beverage filling line.
With its integrated maintenance planning functionality, Maintastic enables users to plan, manage, and monitor maintenance activities, inspections, and repairs. Typical day-to-day use cases include:

Beyond maintenance planning, Maintastic also supports additional maintenance tasks

Asset Management

Management of machines, equipment, or components, including master data, serial numbers, and location information.

Ticketing System

Capturing faults and issues with descriptions, images, videos, or easily via AI-powered voice input directly at the asset using QR codes.

Work Orders

Overview of all open, in-progress, and completed work orders, including status, deadlines, and feedback.

Instructions & Checklists

Providing checklists, inspection reports, and maintenance instructions for standardized working procedures (SOPs).

CMMS App

Mobile access to essential features, including reporting issues using AI-supported voice input, processing work orders, capturing feedback, completing checklists, and viewing asset history.

External Collaboration

Collaborating with machine manufacturers via live video and chat in the direct context of machines, issue reports, and work orders.

Interfaces

Monitoring conditions via IoT systems and automatically generating tickets.

Integration

Integration with existing ERP systems to enable automated data flows for master data, product trees, and work orders.

Try the Maintastic CMMS for free and without obligation

Discover the key CMMS features for your maintenance organization. Start your 14-day cloud-based trial today.
The CMMS is successfully used today across a wide range of industries, including general manufacturing, process industries, construction and mining, food production, transportation and logistics, as well as defense and security.
Logo Schäfer
Logo ESW
SCHMITZ logo
Logo HERMA
Logo Bekum

Comparison of Excel-based preventive maintenance plans and the Maintastic CMMS

The following comparison highlights key differences between Excel-based preventive maintenance plans and the Maintastic CMMS. In addition, it provides a holistic view of how maintenance activities are supported under each approach. The table is based on a factual assessment of the respective capabilities and limitations and has been prepared to the best of our knowledge.
Category Excel- / Paper-Based Maintenance Plans Maintastic CMMS
Implementation
Immediate use possible, no implementation required

Fast onboarding without an IT project in a cloud-based setup
Scalability
Technically not limited, but increasingly difficult to coordinate as the number of machines and users grows

Not limited by the number of machines or users
License Costs
No direct licensing costs


User-based licensing model; cost-efficient access for additional departments via so-called light users
Best suited for
Simple and manageable structures, few users and machines

SMEs with multiple users, machines, or production sites
Training / Onboarding
No formal training required, but high effort for explanations and coordination

Intuitive onboarding, optionally supported by ramp-up and training packages
Maintenance Planning
Manual planning using spreadsheets, adjustments performed manually

Centralized planning of recurring and one-time maintenance activities
Reminders & Due Dates
Manual tracking required, no automated reminders

Due dates, status indicators, and filters for overdue or upcoming maintenance
Maintenance History
Recording possible, but often spread across multiple files, spreadsheets, or folders

Maintenance activities, faults, and work orders are directly linked to the asset
Documentation
Often documented later in the office or paper-based at the machine

Documentation carried out directly within the workflow via smartphone or tablet
Spare Parts Management
Separate lists or tables required, no direct link between maintenance, work orders, and spare parts

Basic linkage of spare parts with assets and work orders
Multi-User Access
Changes generally possible for all users, prone to version conflicts and issues with parallel usage

Controlled via user and role concepts with clearly defined permissions
Mobile Use
Not practical or only very limited

CMMS app for iOS and Android
Asset Management
Basic data can be maintained, no central asset record with linked history

Centralized management of the entire machine and asset base
Reactive Maintenance
No structured fault reporting, no system-based ticket context

Tickets and issue reports directly in the asset context via QR codes
Planned Maintenance
(Preventive Maintenance)

Can be planned, but is highly dependent on manual data maintenancee

System-based preventive maintenance with checklists, reports, and forms
Work Orders
Can be represented as lists or tables

Digital work orders with tasks, deadlines, responsibilities, and closure
Mobile Maintenance
Only possible via printouts or not practical

Organization, execution, and documentation of maintenance activities via app
Autonomous Maintenance
Possible via printouts, but no control over completed work

Digital work instructions for standardized tasks with feedback options
Condition-Based Maintenance
Only limited implementation is possible

Tickets, fault reports, or maintenance orders can be triggered based on events
Dashboard & Reporting
Generally possible, but dependent on manual data maintenance and preparation

Dashboards, filters, evaluations, and export functions for maintenance, tickets, and faults; advanced analytics on the roadmap
Integration with Third-Party Systems
No native integration, data exchange handled manually

Integration with ERP, IoT, and other systems via a powerful API

As of April 2026

Excel or maintenance software: A matter of maintenance maturity

Will Excel as a maintenance planning tool disappear entirely? Probably not. For simple structures, a limited number of machines and maintenance staff, or as an entry point into maintenance planning, Excel can be a useful and practical tool. Ultimately, however, the decisive factor is less the tool itself and more how maintenance requirements evolve within an organization. As the number of users and assets grows, safety and documentation requirements increase, and additional production sites come into play, where processes need to be standardized and comparable, isolated maintenance planning solutions increasingly reach their limits. In such scenarios, professional maintenance software gains importance, as it takes a holistic view of maintenance and treats it as an integrated process – from planning and execution through to documentation and analysis.
Beyond organizational benefits, qualitative factors also become increasingly relevant. These include preserving technical knowledge through digital documentation, reducing the workload of skilled workers through mobile work orders, improving reaction times in the event of failures, and enabling better coordination between maintenance, production, and external service providers.
The transition from Excel to maintenance software is therefore less a technological decision and more a question of maintenance maturity and a clear step toward future-ready maintenance.

FAQ: Common questions about preventive maintenance plans and maintenance planning for SMEs

Is an Excel maintenance plan sufficient for small and medium-sized enterprises?

An Excel-based maintenance plan can be a sensible starting point for SMEs with manageable structures. As long as only a limited number of machines are involved and a small group of people is responsible, maintenance activities can generally be organized using Excel. As complexity increases, more stakeholders are involved, or documentation requirements grow, Excel increasingly reaches its organizational limits.
The transition becomes worthwhile when maintenance activities can no longer be managed reliably through manual planning and control. Typical triggers include increasing requirements for traceability, recurring overdue tasks, or additional production sites where processes need to be standardized and implemented consistently. The decisive factor is less the size of the company and more the maturity of the maintenance organization.
Maintenance software for SMEs should be easy to use, avoid lengthy implementation projects, and meaningfully build on existing maintenance structures. A professional solution such as Maintastic takes a holistic view of maintenance as a connected process – from planning and execution through to documentation and analysis.
Excel can cover individual aspects of preventive maintenance plans and maintenance planning, but it does not replace comprehensive maintenance software. While Excel is a flexible tool, it lacks the systemic integration of planning, execution, documentation, and analysis. For SMEs that want to organize maintenance in a future-proof and scalable way, maintenance software is the right long-term solution.

Take the next step in your maintenance journey

Would you like to find out whether your maintenance planning has reached the next level of maturity? Schedule a personal walkthrough where we show you how the Maintastic CMMS can support your maintenance processes in a practical and meaningful way. Alternatively, you can explore Maintastic on your own and start a 14-day free trial.

Further reading

CMMS explained: Definition, key features, benefits, AI integration, and maintenance applications

Mean Time to Repair (MTTR): Definition, meaning, calculation, and optimization in industrial maintenance

What is OEE in manufacturing? Definition, formula, calculation, benchmarks, and optimization with CMMS, lean, and TPM